The registrar clarified that the elections were conducted in accordance with the law after the immediate resolution of disputes between the President and the Election Commission.
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan has expressed strong displeasure over the recent statement of British High Commissioner to Pakistan Jane Marriott regarding the general elections, here on Wednesday.
As per the details, in her speech at the Asma Jahangir Conference last month, Marriott quoted British Foreign Secretary David Cameron as expressing concerns about the February 8 elections in Pakistan.
In her address, Marriott raised concerns over the exclusion of certain political parties from participating in elections, the alleged use of legal maneuvers to prevent political leaders from participating, and restrictions on recognizable party symbols. He emphasized the need to promote an open society and vibrant democracy in Pakistan.
However, the Registrar of the Supreme Court, in a letter to Marriott, countered his claims, calling them unsubstantiated. The registrar clarified that the elections were conducted in accordance with the law after the immediate resolution of disputes between the President and the Election Commission.
Additionally, the letter referred to earlier Supreme Court judgments on political party eligibility and holding of intra-party elections. It highlighted the unwavering commitment of the judiciary to uphold democratic values and ensure strict implementation of legal provisions.
Beyond the immediate context, the letter also invoked historical analogies, emphasizing a clear acknowledgment of past wrongs and a commitment to transparency. He emphasized the importance of promoting mutual respect and understanding in international relations based on the principles of openness, equality and humanity.
Read More: Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Notice of Islamabad High Court Judges’ Letter
The letter, issued under the direction of the Chief Justice of Pakistan, not only reaffirms the Supreme Court’s commitment to democratic principles, but also emphasizes mutual respect and mutual respect in bilateral relations with the UK.
Comments 2