“We will raise these anomalies before the Supreme Court,” PTI leader said.
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Fawad Chaudhry on Thursday has announced that the his party will challenge the Lahore High Court (LHC) verdict on pleas against Hamza Shahbaz’s election as Chief Minister Punjab in the Supreme Court over anomalies.
In a message from his Twitter handle, Fawad Chaudhry said that the decision by the Lahore High Court has further complicated the political crisis in the province.
“Hamza Shahbaz has lost his government and the solution given by the court will not bring an end to the crisis,” he said.
Fawad Chaudhry said that there are multiple anomalies in the decision and a meeting of legal advisers has been summoned to mull over it.
“We will raise these anomalies before the Supreme Court,” Fawad Chaudhry said.
It merits mention that political crisis in Punjab has deepened as Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday ordered recount of CM Punjab election held on April 16 after excluding votes of 25 de-seated lawmakers of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).
More From FactFile: Punjab CM election: LHC orders vote recount to decide Hamza Shahbaz’s fate
A five member larger bench headed by Justice Sadaqat Ali Khan announced the 4-1 verdict on pleas against Hamza’s election as well as his oath taking.
The court in its verdict states that the decision by Supreme Court of not counting votes of defecting members of a political party is squarely applicable to the election of Chief Minister held on 14th April 2022.
“It is an undeniable fact that 25 members of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf had voted for Mr. Muhammad Hamza Shahbaz, whereas the party had nominated Mr. Pervaiz Ellahi as its candidate.”
“It is an undeniable fact that 25 members of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf had voted for Mr. Muhammad Hamza Shahbaz, whereas the party had nominated Mr. Pervaiz Ellahi as its candidate.”
The court also directed the Presiding Officer (Deputy Speaker) of the election held on 16th April 2022 to recount votes after excluding 25 votes of the defecting members.
Comments 1